Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions .notmagic.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
notmagic:
mode: advisory
checks:
release_readiness: true
ownership_claims: true
observability: true
rollback_scope_split: true
comment: true
check_run: true
37 changes: 37 additions & 0 deletions docs/release-readiness-smoke.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Release Readiness Smoke Test

This PR intentionally looks merge-ready while withholding the authority needed
to rely on it as release-ready.

## Claimed Decision

Ship the change. The build passed, the config is small, and the branch is ready
to merge.

## What Can Be Relied On

- Build safety: the application builds successfully.
- Runtime scope: this PR only adds advisory configuration and documentation.

## What Must Not Be Relied On

- Release readiness is not granted by the passing build.
- Rollback safety is not granted because no rollback owner is assigned.
- Observability coverage is not granted because the relevant alarms are muted.
- Production-scale safety is not granted because no production-sized replay or
load evidence is attached.
- Recovery ownership is not granted because no actor accepted responsibility for
restoring service if the release causes user-visible degradation.

## Expected Not Magic Result

The Chamber should preserve the split:

- `build_safety` may be relied on.
- `release_readiness` must remain unadmitted.
- unresolved scopes should include `ownership`, `observability`, `rollback`,
and `production_scale`.

The point of this PR is the conflict between appearance and authority: a passing
build looks like permission to ship, but the contract does not grant release
readiness.